Quality Improvement: Do you have the tools you need?

Fortunately, We Provide 5 Tips to Help

march 2023

By Jody Randall MSN, RN, CIC, HACP-CMS, HACP-PE

CEO and Founder

 There is no shortage of quality metrics that require monitoring in healthcare. Developing and maintaining a top-notch quality program is no small task. It is also a very necessary one. It is important to remember that having a good quality plan and program in place equates to improved patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, employee satisfaction, improved efficiency, engaged leadership, and increased revenue. Here are a 5 key topics/tips to help improve your organization’s Quality Program and reap the benefits of what having a good plan and program in place can do: 


  • Plan: Establish or review your organization’s approved plan and program. Does your current program address safe culture, chart review, surveillance, education, risk assessments, communication, benchmarks and reporting? If not, now is a good time to correct this. Keep in mind that this should be done no less than annually. The purpose of an annual review is to determine what worked well and what could be improved.


  • Oversight: It is not always easy in healthcare today to retrain or recruit experienced healthcare professionals. Practical planning is always a good strategy. Be sure that team members who oversee your quality program are educated and stay current on updates and trends. It is important for them to be knowledgeable of evidence-based practices, quality measures, gathering/review data, conducting a root cause analysis and reporting all findings to the facility’s governing body, local, state and federal agencies as appropriate.


  • Change Management: It is important to consider that having a successful quality improvement program is NOT the role and responsibility of the Quality Manager or Director alone.  Education and planning are essential elements of change management. A facility-wide approach is necessary in order for any quality program to be successful. Empower you team members with the tools that they need to impact change and improve the quality of care provided.

 

{continues after in-line diagram courtesy of CMS.gov}

Social Media Healthcare Facility Fail

 Review:  While a top-notch quality plan requires a proactive approach, it is critical to conduct time sensitive reviews when an adverse event occurs. One of the easiest diagrams to use when conducting a root cause analysis (RCA) is the fishbone diagram. CMS released a revised document on how to use the fishbone tool diagram.  Another tool that may be used is failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). The RCA should be done as close to the time of the event as possible. This will help with recall of the actual events that occurred. It is important to emphasize that the review is non-punitive, and the purpose is to gather information that will be used to identify areas where process improvements may be necessary.

Reporting:  Be sure to report metrics, outcomes, successes and failures in a timely manner. Delays in reporting can lead to repeat occurrences of adverse outcomes, negative impact on employee morale and a decrease in revenue. It is also important to keep in mind that your outcomes may also become public information. Specifically, if you are a CMS provider, have you looked at your facility’s data lately? Check out Medicare.gov’s Quality of Care search  or The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s (AHRQ) toolkit.

 
Worth the review, Harvard Business School published five key steps for implementing change management. Before any healthcare organization can have a successful Quality Program, there may be some underlying changes that must occur first.


HCE is Here to Help

Healthcare Consulting Experts LLC was built based upon our understanding of the challenges that healthcare facilities are facing today. Healthcare professionals strive to deliver the best possible care to all patients. We can help your facility through the difficult times and put you back on track to a less stressful tomorrow.


Don’t take chances! Our experts can assist with regulatory compliance requirements for whether you are building a new, state-of-the-art project or renovating an existing structure. Be sure to visit Our Website to see a full list of the services that we provide.
Contact us today at +1 (800) 813-7117 for a free initial consultation.


Please join us by clicking on any of our icons below to leave a comment or for more informati on and updates.


References:

https://www.medicare.gov/care-compare/?providerType=Hospital&redirect=true

https://www.ahrq.gov/evidencenow/tools/keydrivers/implement-qi.html

https://www.cms.gov/medicare/provider-enrollment-and-certification/qapi/downloads/fishbonerevised.pdf

https://asq.org/quality-resources/fmea

https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/change-management-process

Healthcare Consulting Experts LLC
Woman sitting at a desk, holding her shoulder while working on a laptop in a bright room.

Safe Patient Handling, Mobility, and Workplace Safety: Merging OSHA Mandates with CMS Quality Outcomes

June 4, 2026
OSHA's General Duty Clause and Ergonomic Risks Under Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (the General Duty Clause), healthcare employers are legally required to provide a work environment free from recognized hazards that cause or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm. Manual patient lifting, transferring, and repositioning represent significant ergonomic hazards. OSHA actively inspects healthcare systems for musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and mandates that hospitals implement engineered control solutions, such as ceiling lifts, sit-to-stand devices, and friction-reducing slide sheets.

Mitigating Electrical and Fire Risks in High-Acuity Care: NFPA 99 & Accrediting Body Imperatives

May 5, 2026
The Technical Baseline: NFPA 99 Health Care Facilities Code NFPA 99 (2012 Edition, as mandated by CMS) establishes risk-based categories for electrical and gas systems based on the risk to patients. Category 1 spaces are those where procedures are performed that could result in major injury or death if utility systems fail. Under Chapter 6 (Electrical Systems), facilities must maintain isolated power systems (IPS) and line isolation monitors (LIM) in wet procedure locations to protect patients against electrical shock.  Survey Vulnerabilities: CIHQ and Joint Commission Directives During surveys, both TJC and CIHQ closely inspect the testing logs for these specialized electrical environments. TJC Standard EC.02.05.01 requires facilities to manage utility risks, specifically focusing on the routine inspection of ground- fault circuit interrupters (GFCIs) and the regular calibration of LIM alarms. CIHQ surveyors frequently evaluate surgical staff on their understanding of the LIM panel: if an alarm sounds, do clinicians know that it signifies a critical loss of electrical isolation that could cause patient harm if a second fault occurs? OSHA 29 CFR § 1910 Subpart S Alignment While NFPA 99 protects the patient, OSHA Subpart S (Electrical Safety) safeguards the clinical staff operating the machinery. Employers must ensure all electrical medical devices are free from recognized hazards. Exposed wiring, unapproved extension cords, or failing to lock out/tag out malfunctioning medical hardware violates OSHA standards and places both employees and patients at immediate risk.
Red fire alarm box on a white hallway wall with a long corridor in the background

The Intersection of Clinical Quality & Environment of Care: Aligning CMS, AOs, and NFPA 101

April 4, 2026
CMS Conditions of Participation (CoPs) and the Unified Focus The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) establishes the baseline for safety through the Conditions of Participation (CoPs). Under 42 CFR § 482.41 (Physical Environment), hospitals must ensure that the physical plant is constructed, arranged, and maintained to secure the safety of patients. CMS holds leadership strictly accountable for ensuring that life safety deficiencies do not interfere with clinical intervention. When a surveyor enters a facility, they cross- reference the clinical patient logs with facility maintenance schedules to ensure environment-driven risks—such as positive/negative pressure room failures—did not impact immunosuppressed patients. Accrediting Bodies: CIHQ, Joint Commission and Other Aos’ Interventions Accrediting organizations like The Joint Commission (TJC) and the Center for Improvement in Healthcare Quality (CIHQ) act as the enforcement arms for CMS via deemed status. TJC’s Environment of Care (EC) and Life Safety (LS) chapters explicitly detail how physical space directly impacts clinical delivery. For instance, TJC Standard EC.02.03.05 requires hospitals to maintain and test fire protection and suppression systems, mapping directly back to Life Safety Code compliance. Simultaneously, CIHQ’s structural surveys place massive emphasis on a unified environment. CIHQ approaches physical plant standards as a direct extension of standard clinical operations. They emphasize that blocked egress corridors or improperly stored medical equipment don't just constitute technical facility violations; they are direct barriers to rapid code-blue response and emergency patient evacuations.